Thursday, October 29, 2009

CNN lists Church Musician Among Most Stressful, Least Paid, by Jeffery Tucker


CNN says
Median pay: $40,800
% who say their job is stressful: 67%

You may not think of people who plan, direct and conduct performances for religious services as being under a particularly high amount of stress. But they also choose the appropriate psalm or hymn for every wedding and funeral -- only some of the most important events in a family's life. And those stressful situations can create some demanding clients.

"Every now and then you'll get a strange request," said Dan Fenn, Music Ministry Director at St. John's Lutheran Church in Northfield, Minn. "A couple of years ago I got a request to play the Beer Barrel Polka at a funeral. You have to ask yourself, is this appropriate for a worship service?"

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

The Doctrine of Purgatory and its Interpretation by Dante Alighieri, -- Aaron Foshee


The Doctrine of Purgatory and its Interpretation by Dante Alighieri

"The Ascent of Purgatory is the journey to the emancipation from sin. Only after total recognition and total emancipation may the final sublime ascent to the presence of God Begin."
(John Ciardi)

The tradition of praying for the dead is a practice held by many respective faiths throughout the world, and goes back thousands of years. From ancient Egyptians, to modern day Catholics, a middle state between this temporal life and the sanctified life has been thought to exist. With specific attention given to Roman Catholicism, it can be seen that a consistency has been maintained in the teaching of the existence of the state of Purgatory:

"A place of temporary punishment for those who have died in the state of grace, but have not fully satisfied God’s justice for all punishment due their sins."

The teachings of the Church, including the input of Church Fathers such as St.’s Cyril and Augustine, and biblical references are the backing for this belief. When Dante Alighieri wrote his Divine Comedy, then, the existence of Purgatory was a well-established Christian Doctrine. Dante took this doctrine and expounded upon it in ingenious poetic fashion to create a believable world for this doctrinal “middle state” to latch on to. Dante’s Purgatorio gave the actual state of cleansing a face and an essence, allowing the reader or audience to easily comprehend a matter of faith. It is important to remember that Dante’s Purgatorio is just that: Dante’s purgatory. Each physical aspect of this land of purgation is Dante’s creation, though their moral underpinnings are clearly doctrinal. Dante’s Purgatorio reflects a personal poetic interpretation of the theological premise of Purgatory in the Catholic Church while maintaining and bolstering Catholic Doctrine.

To fully grasp the doctrine of Purgatory, one must first understand the foundation on which it is established. There are two parts to this foundation within the Catholic Church. The first part is the teachings of the Church Fathers and Doctors. One of the earliest Fathers to speak specifically regarding the purgation of souls was St. Cyril of Jerusalem. In his Catechetical Lectures, Cyril described the importance of praying for the dead by linking their fate to that of the entire Communion of Saints:

"Let us not … be weary in giving aid to the departed, both by offering on their behalf and obtaining prayers for them: for the common Expiation of the world is even before us. Therefore with boldness do we then entreat for the whole world, and name their names with those of martyrs, of confessors, of priests. For in truth one body are we all, though some members are more glorious than others; and it is possible from every source to gather pardon for them, from our prayers, from our gifts in their behalf, from those whose names are named with theirs."

In this same lecture, Cyril gives an allegory to give clarity to his speech:

"If a king were to banish certain who had given him offence, and then those who belong to them would weave a crown and offer it to him on behalf of those under punishment, would he not grant a remission of their penalties? In the same way we, when we offer to Him our supplications for those who have fallen asleep, though they be sinners, weave no crown, but offer up Christ sacrificed for our sins, propitiating our merciful God for them as well as for ourselves."

This thought process was expounded upon by one of the most renowned Church Fathers, St. Augustine. He reiterated the efficacy of prayers for the dead on many occasions, asking: “When … works of mercy are performed for their sakes, who can doubt that this benefits those for whom prayers are not sent up to God in vain?”

In his famous City of God, St. Augustine goes on to give a logical reasoning for belief in Purgatory:

"[T]emporary punishments are suffered by some in this life, only, by others after death, by others both now and then; but all of them before that last and strictest judgment. But of those who suffer temporary punishments after death, all are not doomed to those everlasting pains which are to follow that judgment."

The most important theologian of the Catholic Church, St. Thomas Aquinas, condensed the teachings of the Church Fathers in his renowned scholastic works. In the Summa Contra Gentiles, this Doctor of the Church felt compelled to write with regard to the purgative state. He gives logical conclusions to logical tracts of thought:

"[Sin] is purified in this life by penance and other sacraments... It happens sometimes that this process … is not entirely accomplished in this life; and the offender remains still a debtor with a debt of punishment upon him… Not for this does he deserve to be entirely shut out from reward… Such persons must be cleansed in the next life, before entering upon their eternal reward. This cleansing is done by penal inflictions, as even in this life it might have been completed by penal works of satisfaction: otherwise the negligent would be better off then the careful, if the penalty that men do not pay here for their sins is not to be undergone by them in the life to come... And this is the reason why we posit a purgatory, or place of cleansing."

These great men of faith did not merely state this premise without due cause. Their belief in Purgatory sprung from the Jewish tradition of praying for the dead, as well as Scriptural references of the said practice. The most straightforward passage of Holy Writ concerning penal atonement after death is found in the second book of Maccabees. In the twelfth chapter, the book recalls that after a fierce battle, Judas Maccabeus rallied his army at the city of Adullam. He sent men out to recover the bodies of those who had been slain, to give them proper burial. When they went to reclaim the bodies, they discovered that the dead had amulets of “the idols of Jamnia” underneath their coats. Seeing this, the men new that this was the reason God had allowed them to die. They then “prayed that the sinful deed might be fully blotted out” and returned to camp with the bodies. Judas immediately took up a collection of silver from his soldiers and sent it to Jerusalem to make “atonement for the dead that they might be freed from their sin.”

With this understanding, one can fully appreciate the literary actions of Dante in his Divine Comedy. As Francis Fergusson stated in a speech entitled The Divine Comedy as a “Bridge Across Time:” “Dante intended the commedia to answer practically all the questions that a puzzled human being may ask.”

The most important themes that Dante picks up from the theological idea of Purgatory are penance and restoration. This is in stark contrast to the Inferno, the first article of Dante’ comedy. In the Inferno, all is despair; there is no hope of fulfilling ones punishments, for they are eternal.

When he first reaches Purgatory, Dante sees before him a great mountain. Upon the mountain is “a winding ascent … that straightens souls whom the world has made crooked.” This passage is very important in understanding the allegorical habits of Dante. Referring back to the Inferno, this “winding ascent” in many ways parallels Minos’ serpent-like tale that rapt around a pole to signify the depth of Hell a sinner was to descend. As a microcosm of Hell, Minos showed the ringed structure of the infernal abyss. These rings were divided and subdivided by the nature of the sin committed differentiating the punishments to particular categories. In the same manner, Purgatory reflects this structure in its antithetical correlation with the Inferno, having ascending rings and means of purification. This mirrored resemblance is where the correlation ceases, however. Those in the Inferno never experience any joy, contentment, or rest, whereas in Purgatorio:

"During the daylight hours the pilgrim climbs, sees, talks, thinks, and learns from Virgil’s explanations; during the 3 nights of the journey he must pause, rest, sleep, and dream, in the hope of new inspirations to help him on his way."

Another allegory, and probably the most important to remember, is the placing of the sin of pride at the base of Mount Purgatory. As John Ciardi related in a speech on the relevance of Dante’s writings to the modern day:

"In the Purgatorio, Dante reaches the ledge on which the proud are crushed into the dust under the enormous weights, he leaves no doubt of his inner feelings. Here is a sin for which he knows he must himself answer. He has achieved a recognition of his failing and he has begun his soul’s expiation in dread of the greater expiation he must endure when his soul returns to that painful ledge after death."

It is implied that Dante was aware of the fact the pride is the root of all sin. Pride is shown to be the foundation for the mountain of sinful acts, be it gluttony, avarice, lust, etc. Thus, the place of satisfaction for pride is the foundation for penance. Dante grasps that all sinners endure this aspect of Purgatory for some time, before moving on to other parts of the realm of cleansing.
This is the first of many realizations for Dante throughout this poem of repentance and restoration to the fullness of God’s love. It all culminates with the entrance into earthly paradise at the pinnacle of Mount Purgatory. Here, Dante’s trusted guide, Virgil, states the aim of all Christians in their striving for perfection:

"Behold the sun which gleams upon your brow,
Behold the grass, the flowers, and the young trees
Which this land, of its own, brings forth to grow…
Your judgment now is free and whole and true;
To fail to follow its will would be to stray.
Lord of yourself, I crown and miter you. "

With this, Dante closes his splendid second article of the Divina Commedia, leaving the audience prepared to enter the realm of the Blessed: Paradise.

From the earliest times of Christianity, the belief in a purging state between this life and the glorified life has existed. This “Church Suffering” awaits its final reward, and atones for its transgressions against the Perfection of God. Until the writing of the Divine Comedy, however, the Christian faithful was not unified in a physical idea of this state. Dante Alighieri, through is impressive command of verse, was able to give a personal interpretation on this realm of the afterlife, allowing for the strengthening of this doctrine of the Church. The words of John Demaray, author of The Invention of Dante’s Commedia, sum up the worth of Dante’s Purgatorio to the promulgation of this great doctrine of the Catholic Church:

"In the Purgatorio as in collectible pilgrimage upon earth, man in fellowship and song, repentance and hope, is able to confess and be forgiven his sins while progressing up the steep path to salvation."


Bibliography
• Alighieri, Dante. Divina Commedia. Trans. and ed. Anthony Elosen. New York: Random House, Inc., 2003.

• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Contra Gentiles. London: Burns and Oates, 1905.

• Augustine. The City of God. New York: Random House, Inc., 1996.

• Augustine. Sermons. Trans. Edmund Hill, O.P. New Rochelle, NY: New City Press, 1992.

• Ciardi, John. The Relevance of the Inferno. Washington: Gertrude Clarke Whitthall Poetry and Literature Fund, 1965.

• Cyril of Jerusalem. Catechetical Lecture. New York: Random House, Inc., 1996.

• Demaray, John G. The Invention of Dante’s Commedia. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.

• Fergusson, Francis. The Divine Comedy as a “Bridge Across Time”. Washington: Gertrude Clarke Whitthall Poetry and Literature Fund, 1965.

• Morrow, Most Reverend Louis LaRavoire. My Catholic Faith. Kansas City: Sarto House Publishing, 1954.

• The New American Bible: St. Joseph Edition. New York: Catholic Book Publishing Co., 1992.

• Smith, George D., D.D., Ph.D., Canon. The Teaching of the Catholic Church: A Summary of Catholic Doctrine. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1959.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

THE HOLY NAME OF MARY



If the winds of temptation surge, if you run aground on the shoals of troubles, look to this star, call upon Mary! If you are tossed by the winds of pride or ambition or detraction or jealousy, look to this star, call upon Mary! If anger or greed or the allurements of the flesh dash against the boat of your mind, look to Mary! And if you are troubled by the enormity of your sins, confused by the foulness of your conscience, terrified by the horror of the Judgment, so that you begin to be swallowed up by the pit of sadness, the abyss of despair, think of Mary! In dangers, in straits, in perplexity, think of Mary, call upon Mary. Let her name be always in your mouth and in your heart, and, if you would ask for and obtain the help of her prayers, do not forget the example of how she lived. If you follow her, you will not go astray. If you pray to her, you will not despair. If you think of her, you will not be lost. If you cling to her, you will not fail. If she protects you, you will not fear; if she is your guide, you will not tire; if she is favorable to you, you will reach your goal. Thus you will experience personally how rightly it was spoken “And the Virgin’s name was Mary.”

~ Saint Bernard of Clairvaux


Saturday, October 24, 2009

From England...

From England...

Posted using ShareThis

Anglican Bishop of Chichester Considering Conversion



Anglican Bishop of Chichester Considering Conversion

Fr. Dwight Longenecker has an interesting bit of news on his blog, Standing on my Head:

This amazing bit of news just breaking is truly momentous. A sitting Church of England Diocesan bishop has announced that he is ready to convert to Rome and be re-ordained. John Hind is the bishop of Chichester on the South Coast of England. His diocese is centered in the ancient city of Chichester. Chichester is well known as an Anglo Catholic diocese. (It is the diocese into which I was ordained as an Anglican priest) If the bishop goes you can be sure that many of his clergy and people will follow.

This is truly momentous news. I know of no other precedent in modern times of a sitting bishop in the Church of England to make such an announcement. They usually wait until their retirement or resignation to announce their plans. John Hind is not even one of the 'flying bishops' who look after the traditionalists. If he and the other bishops in the Church of England act courageously and do as they say they will do we may be witnessing a truly historic re-alignment in Western Christianity.

Read the whole story: Chichester Bishop Ready to Convert

The Telegraph notes he is "considering" this and would be "happy" to be re-ordained as a Catholic priest, though it is not yet a fait accompli. Nonetheless, the news is noteworthy.

The original Telegraph story may be found here: Senior Anglican bishop reveals he is ready to convert to Roman Catholicism

Post-Rapture Pet Care


ALSTEAD, N.H. -- Christians who believe they'll vanish from Earth in the rapture can now hire an atheist to care for their pets.

For $110, Eternal Earth-Bound Pets offers a 10-year contract guaranteeing that an atheist will adopt the pet that's left behind by its raptured owner. Additional pets can be covered for $15.

The company's owner, Bart Centre, said his pet rescuers definitely won't be raptured because they've all blasphemed the Holy Spirit in writing, committing what they believe Jesus called the unforgivable sin.

His Web site said the rescuers are animal lovers who "are committed to step in when you step up to Jesus."

Centre said he doesn't believe in God or the rapture, but is offering a service for those who do.

The service is available in 22 states, including Oklahoma.


To learn more, visit: http://eternal-earthbound-pets.com/

Friday, October 23, 2009

Bulgarian Orthodox Express Desire for "Quick Restoration" of Communion


One can hope that this is a sign of more to come!

By way of an email, I was directed to a story which appeared on the blog, Da Mihi Animas, and which ultimately came from Zenit.

That story expressed the sentiments of Bishop Tichon, head of the diocese for Central and Western Europe of the Patriarchate of Bulgaria for speedy re-union with the See of Rome at the end of this past Wednesday's general audience.

"People don't understand our divisions and our discussions," the bishop stated. He affirmed that he will "not spare any efforts" to work for the quick restoration of "communion between Catholics and Orthodox."

Bishop Tichon said that "the theological dialogue that is going forward in these days in Cyprus is certainly important, but we should not be afraid to say that we must find as soon as possible the way to celebrate together."

[...]

The prelate told the Pontiff that "this aspiration is a feeling that arose from the works of the assembly" of his diocese, held in Rome, in which all the priests and two delegates from every Bulgarian Orthodox parish took part.

Ah, History! -- From Rome to, Well, Rome!


From 500BC to circ. 1300AD, there were two primary divisions within the continuity of the historical storyline of Europe: the Roman era and the Middle Ages

The Roman era can be divided into two units: the Republic and the Empire. From 500 BC to 44 BC, Rome was ruled by a bureaucratic senatorial system that would set a foundation for later countries during the Post-Enlightenment to follow.

To the Roman Republic, three virtues governed society: pietas (piety), gravitas (seriousness), and constantia (constancy). Based upon these ruling virtues, the Roman Republic was equipped to expand its territories. With this expansion came the corruption of these virtues, especially in the senate, where corruption eventually led to civil wars and impotent governing power. There were many attempts to stop the downward spiral of the republic, such as the Gracchi Brother’s Land Reforms, but the republic would never fully recover.

With the installation of Julius Caesar as Consul, the Republic, in all but appearance, died. Though Caesar was assassinated, his legacy of monarchic style rule for the Roman government lived on. Rome formally became an empire under the reign of Julius Caesar’s heir Octavian, later known as Augustus (27 BC-14AD). Augustus’ rule brought about the Pax Romana, which lasted over 200 years. This allowed for Virgil to write his famous Aenied, which was the sequel to the Iliad, and told of the founding of Rome by Trojan remnants, while forecasting a never-ending Roman rule throughout the world “per omnia seacula seaculorum.” It also allowed Christianity to spread within the empire as there was relatively little warfare.

With the death of Marcus Aurilius in 180 AD, the Pax Romana came to an end. Wars and governmental impotence once again began to ravage the empire, crippling army strength and morale of the nation. Barbarians began to flood through the frontier borders, disrupting and destroying the Roman way of life. The Empire divided into east and west. The Eastern Empire, known as the Byzantine Empire would survive well into the 15th century, while the Western Roman Empire collapsed with the onslaught of the barbarian hordes. The end of the great Roman political structure did allow for the blossoming of the Christian culture, as seen in the lives of St. Augustine, St. Ambrose, St. Jerome, etc. With their help, Europe entered into the Middle Ages, at time of Christian growth and Germanic, roman, and Christian culture mixing.

The Middle Ages saw the growth of the Church as an institution in both religious and temporal power. Popes became the predominant leading and unifying figures of this era. All of Europe was eventually united under the banner of Christendom, though this did not stop the Germanic peoples from fighting among themselves.

A ray of hope came with the Carolingian dynasty, particularly with Charlemagne. He represented a foreshadowing of the forthcoming Renaissance, for he encouraged education, united many under a single religion and nation, and paved the way for decentralized governing with the institutions of counties and provinces. He was crowned holy Roman Emperor on Christmas day, 800 AD.

After his death, Europe once again fell into disorder, with factions fighting each other. With the fighting came a miming of the Roman corruption within the Church, for the clergy began to fall into vise and abuse. It all came to a climax with the Great Schism, in which three men claimed the throne of St. Peter.

Meanwhile, Scholastic work was taking place, particularly with St. Thomas Aquinas. Epic poetry, specifically the Divine Comedy of Dante, was also being written. These artistic and philosophical initiations, as well as the crumbling feudal system led to the next section of history: the age of rebirth and Revolt.


Ah, History! -- Humanism


From the cob-webs of Western Civ. class, fall of 2006. I thought I'd share.



Conflict, change and uncertainty were the themes of the Renaissance and its novel outlook on life: Humanism. This rebirth in Western Civilization of the humanities was not without its difficulties, for with the resurgence of Greco-Roman language and writings came a revolutionary concept of self.

Of all the great thinkers of humanism, three people stand out: Petrarch, Mirandola, and Erasmus. Petrarch (1304-1374), now known as the Father of humanism was one of the first men to proclaim this ideology. His “love for classical learning” fostered the growth of the Humanist concept. He went so far as to say that the Middle Ages had been made up of people who were “not only ignorant, but demented” in their rejection of Classicism.

Over a hundred years after Petrarch, Mirandola (1463-1494) expounded on the Humanist outlook by offering a new theory on humanity’s existence. To Pico, humans were the most dignified of God’s creation, given the choice of devolving into beast or evolving into spirit. Pico stated that humanity “ordained for [itself] the limits of [its] nature.” With this revolutionary idea, Pico contested and, in many respects, overthrew the old mentality of fatalism; man was in a state of stasis.

Finally, Erasmus (1466-1536), “Prince of humanists” encapsulated the humanist mindset by his prolific writings that attacked the hypocrisy, ignorance and dishonesty of the time period. In his “Colloquies,” Erasmus used satire to drive home his opinions against the common superstitions of the time,

With this new sense of individuality, nationalism grew increasingly important, which pulled at the very seams of Christendom. Furthermore, power and prowess became the goal of clergy and nobility. Hence, conflict between Church and State, as well as upper and lower classes became increasingly severe. Wars broke out, rebellions ensued, and inflation skyrocketed. To add insult to injury, the Black Death infiltrated Europe, annihilating entire villages and decimating the population of Western civilization. With such conflict came thoughts of uncertainty; people began to questions absolutes with regard to religion and politics. From this was born the Protestant revolt, where men like Martin Luther, Henry VIII and John Calvin benefited from the weakening feudal structure to advance their ideologies.

1517 marked the beginning of the Protestant Revolt, with Martin Luther and his 95 Theses. In these theses, he rejected the authority of the pope to issue indulgences. He would later reject more concepts of Catholicism, including transubstantiation, and church hierarchy. His split with the Catholic Church sparked others to do the same. The most renowned of post-Lutheran Reformists is John Calvin of France. A former clergyman with an extensive law background, he was most renowned for his stance on pre-destination, which he began to preach in 1534. The last great Reformist is Henry VIII of England, though he really only rejected the temporal authority of the pope, making no steps himself to follow Luther or Calvin in their theology.

The Catholic Church was not without a reply to this revolt, however. In 1543, Pope Paul III called he Council of Trent, which ended up being one of the most important councils ever called the Catholic Church. It cemented Catholic doctrine, and gave guidelines as to how to teach these doctrines to the faithful.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Communion in the Hand: a Controversy and a Personal Decision



Today, after much prayerful meditation and thought on the subject, I have decided, with great reservation, to begin taking communion in the hand. If you know me, you will find this to be a contradiction on my part, and I will admit that, in most respects, it is.

In order to understand my reasoning for this decision, one must first understand my reasoning for initialing rejecting this form of receiving the Eucharist. The first, and most obvious, reason for my receiving Holy Communion on the tongue is because it is the traditional practice of the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church to receive on the tongue (Pope Paul VI, Memoriale Domini ). Secondly, this way of reception is in all ways more reverent and respectful of the 2nd Person of the Trinity embodied in the Eucharist. Finally, it imparts a form of non-verbal evangelization for those who see this take place.

But today, I realized that the current manner of reception of the Eucharist is, unfortunately, lacking a fundamental aspect: kneeling. In fact, I found that out all too well during Mass today. As I received the Host on my tongue, it slipped, nearly fell, and there was no traditional paten, save for the one used by the distributing priest, to catch it. Fortunately, I did not drop the Body of Christ, but it was a very unsettling event for me. In that moment I realized that the new “traditional” way of preparation and reception – standing in a conveyer belt style line – was not conducive to reception on the tongue in any way.

I must make clear that the priest who was distributing Communion did have a paten which held the other Hosts, and I am sure that he would have made every effort possible to catch the Host if it had indeed fallen. If it had fallen, it would have been because of my inabilities, not his.

This made me reflect on the manner of preparation regarding Communion. In the traditional manner, one kneels, and waits for the priest to place the Host on the tongue. There is no “shooting at a moving object.” Because of this, reception of Communion is not only reverential, but also much less prone to botching. This is a perfect reason for reinstating altar rails, in my opinion.

With the current state of affairs regarding reception of Communion, however, I see it as almost a necessity for myself to receive Holy Communion in the hand so as to preserve and protect the sacrosanct nature of the Sacrament we have the honor of receiving.

In reality, this necessity is meant only for myself. If I were more mouth-eye coordinated, this little ditty of a message would not exist. But as it stands, I feel I must pick the lesser of two “evils,” in that I, a non-ordained man, would rather hold our Lord in my sinning hands than see my King fall at my feet.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Download Your Hymns, Pay Nothing


For anyone looking for a good resource for sacred music, this is definitely a good start.

Download Your Hymns, Pay Nothing

Sunday, October 4, 2009

YouTube - Bach, Contrapunctus 9, Art of Fugue (Kunst der Fuge)

I thought this was a great way to show visually the voices utilized in a fugue. Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY_GMnQvj6E&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=81D26D4A47388279&index=6

Accuracy, Not Innovation


The following is taken from paragraph 20, section II of article 36 in Sacrosantum Concilium, concerning the translation of liturgical texts into the vernacular languages:

The Latin liturgical texts of the Roman Rite, while drawing on centuries of ecclesial experience in transmitting the faith of the Church received from the Fathers, are themselves the fruit of the liturgical renewal, just recently brought forth. In order that such a rich patrimony may be preserved and passed on through the centuries, it is to be kept in mind from the beginning that the translation of the liturgical texts of the Roman Liturgy is not so much a work of creative innovation as it is of rendering the original texts faithfully and accurately into the vernacular language. While it is permissible to arrange the wording, the syntax and the style in such a way as to prepare a flowing vernacular text suitable to the rhythm of popular prayer, the original text, insofar as possible, must be translated integrally and in the most exact manner, without omissions or additions in terms of their content, and without paraphrases or glosses. Any adaptation to the characteristics or the nature of the various vernacular languages is to be sober and discreet.

For the full text concerning liturgical translation, go to:
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20010507_liturgiam-authenticam_en.html

"Confession of a Modern Nun"



Other than to say that I'm not surprised, I'll let this article speak for itself...

http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=11905

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Why I decided to go to Seminary

This is an adaptation of a note I wrote for Facebook a few months before I headed to seminary:

“This is the Will of God, your holiness.” – I Thess. 4:3

As I have grown in my understanding of my Catholic faith, I have come to realize that each is called to a unique vocation, which ultimately brings us, if properly followed, to the end result of holiness, righteousness and an eternal dwelling with Almighty God. Just as unique as each person, a vocation will nonetheless bring about the same result, that is, the result destined for all humanity – sanctification. Some will never know the beauty of a proper vocation – some scoff at the notion that Our Lord has created a marvelously fitting path for us to take as individuals and as members of His Church. Yet, as Believers in Christ, in His Authority and the authority He passed down in His Church, we must realize God’s true omniscience and omnipotence (Jer. 1:5).

Some of my closest friends have questioned my recent decision to go on to seminary. Out of love for me, they have asked “Why?” As a Catholic priest, I would be faced with many challenges that seem commonplace and cultural to most. Two issues have seemed to be the most important concerns put in front of me. The first, obviously, is celibacy. Having so many friends of Protestant persuasion, it is a choice that would at first seem illogical. In a society where sex is so prevalent, Christianity has been inundated with the false idea of the inability to maintain a celibate lifestyle. In all honesty, celibacy is more difficult in our current time due to media, a devolving Christian culture and non- Christian cultural influence. We have forgotten that the sexual act is one of spiritual and physical unity. Unity between spouses foreshadows our own unity with Almighty God. Today’s culture views “sex” as simply a physical act; one in which we, as animals, are “programmed” to seek out (I Thess. 4:4-5).

The sacrament of Matrimony is a microcosm of the unity that exists between Christ and His Church. As Christ freely gave of Himself on the Cross, and asks for complete surrender of His Church to His Divine Will, so too must man and wife freely give of each other and surrender one to another. This cannot be done by frustrating the matrimonial act in an unnatural manner. God does not give to us what He has not strengthened us to endure. In this day in age, modern thought has allowed for "the pill," condems, diaphragms, etc. to justify having marital relations that are not fruitful in any measure. Two do not become one flesh under such circumstances (Eph. 5:31); the act is interrupted, impeded. The sacred act of marital love cannot bring to fruition what God has ordained it to do, principally to bring about the conception of life.

What one must remember about the sacrament of Matrimony is that it is, in and of itself, a vocation. One is called to the married life; it cannot be a simple choice. People seem to think that married life and celibacy do not share equal weight or importance, yet, as vocations, their end should be the same – not self-fulfillment, but edification and glorification of God. No matter the path taken in life, our end will be the same, for “unto dust you shall return.”(Gen. 3:19).

The second concern, that of Orthodoxy, has been placed before me from my fellow Catholics. I have gone through a long journey of faith within the past decade. I came from a Protestant background, to the Catholic Church; I have come from the vantage of a new convert, to a pessimistic viewpoint of one who thinks he knows more than his superiors. I have lived the Faith because of love for it, and have nearly lost the Faith because of despair within it. Our Lord has shown me His mercy and compassion, and His “ever-present help in distress.” (Ps. 46:2). Because of this, I feel that the choice of a diocesan priest is one that is fitting for my current state of faith. My Faith has been simplified by placing Faith, Hope, and Charity in those of authority within the Church (I Cor. 13:13).

I have decided to become a diocesan priest because I feel truly called to Oklahoma; to minister to its Catholics and its non-Catholics. I know the predicament of the Church – I know its short-comings and its sometimes ugly countenance. Yet I am reminded of Christ’s actions toward Mary Magdalene when I begin to despair… who am I to throw the first rock (John 8:7)? Who am I to tout orthodoxy when my own life has been riddled with sin, with heresy of mind and body? This does not mean that I do not fight for what I know is true and good in the Faith, for as a Catholic, I know that is my obligation to Holy Mother Church. If I do not fight for these things, I condemn myself to die alongside Her, for I count myself as a member of Her Body, and, therefore, a member of Christ (I Cor. 12:12-13). What better way to bolster this wonderful Faith than to work for holiness within Her?

I hope this does explain, in part, how I feel regarding this important decision in my life.

Benedicat vos, Omnipotens Deus: Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus

Aaron James Foshee,

Seminarian for the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City

Now THIS is a chapel!



http://thomasaquinas.edu/news/pressroom/photos.html